Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.atari    |    Fans of the granddaddy of video gamery    |    217 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 101 of 217    |
|    MI5Victim@mi5.gov.uk to All    |
|    MI5 Persecution: how and why did it star    |
|    26 Dec 06 20:34:02    |
      XPost: free.it.cracks, alt.pl.nauka.angielskiego, de.soc.recht.wohnen       XPost: tw.bbs.alumni.sungshan              -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-       -= how and why did it start? -=       -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-              The harassment didn't start by itself, so someone must have been there at       the outset to give it a firm push and set the "animals" after me. It looks       as if I was set up in June 1990, and the timing indicates someone from       university was responsible.              >One thing which has been missing from this discussion is this simple       >prognosis: that maybe he is right and that, despite his admitted       >mental condition, there really is a campaign against him organised by       >now-influential ex-students of his university.              In May or June 1990, Alan Freeman on Radio 1 read out a letter from someone       who had known me for a few years, who wrote of the one who "wore out his       welcome with random precision" (from the Pink Floyd song). Freeman went on       to say to the writer "that's a hell of a letter you wrote there". The       indication is strongly that people I had parted from soon before nursed a       grudge against me and were trying to cause trouble for me.              The suggestion is that Freeman might have shown the letter to other people,       and things could have snowballed from there. Right from the start the real       source (security services presumed) didn't announce themselves as the       origin, but let the "talkers", the radio DJs, believe that they were the       originators. Think about it; if you announce, "we're MI5 and we have a       campaign against this bloke" then people might not go along with it; but if       you say, "everyone else is getting at this bloke because he 'deserves' it"       then people will join in with fewer qualms.              >Why would "they" wish to assassinate your character?              It's the classic case of hitting a cripple to prove you're stronger. Why       would the security services expend hundreds of thousands of pounds and more       than six years of manpower to try to kill a British citizen? Because they       are motivated by people who knew me at university and feel personal       animosity; because they knew me to be emotionally weak, and it is in the       nature of bullies to prey on those known to be weak; and because they can       rely on the complicity of the establishment, which the security services       manipulate and derive funding from. This is England's biggest humiliation       today, and the British security services are intent on preventing their       humiliation becoming reality by continuing their campaign of attempted       murder to suppress the truth from becoming public.              686                     --       Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca