XPost: free.it.cracks, alt.pl.nauka.angielskiego, de.soc.recht.wohnen   
   XPost: tw.bbs.alumni.sungshan   
      
   -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=   
   -= why the security services? -=   
   -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=   
      
   You may ask, why do I think the "they" referred to are the security   
   services? Is there any evidence that there is a single source, as opposed   
   to a loosely based "whispering campaign" amongst many people? Even if there   
   is a single source, is there any evidence that "they" are professional   
   "buggers" as opposed to amateurs, or perhaps people working for a privately   
   funded organization?   
      
   a) As to the question of a single source versus something more fragmented;   
   it is quite obvious that there is a single source from the way the campaign   
   has been carried out. Since things have been repeated verbatim which were   
   said in my home, there must be one group which does the watching and   
   listening. Since on several occasions (mainly during travel) people have   
   been planted in close proximity and rehearsed in what they were to say, it   
   follows that someone must have done the planning for that, and again a   
   single source is indicated.   
      
   b) So why couldn't it be amateurs? Why couldn't it be a private   
   organisation, for example a private detective agency paid to manage the   
   campaign and undertake the technical aspects? Some detective agencies are   
   unscrupulous as has been proved on the occasions in the past when they've   
   been exposed or caught; they too can have access to the bugging technology   
   deployed; and there are reported cases of MI5 paying private eyes to do   
   their dirty work (against peace campaigners and similar enemies of the   
   state) on the understanding that if they were caught then they could deny   
   all knowledge. Why couldn't that be the case?   
      
   The main factor pointing to direct security service involvement (as opposed   
   to amateurs or MI5 proxies) is the breadth of their access to the media in   
   particular, and the fact that the television companies are so involved in   
   the campaign. The BBC would not directly invade someone's home themselves,   
   since it would not be within their remit to allocate personnel or financial   
   resources to do so. An organisation of their stature would not take part in   
   a campaign set up by private sources. The only people they would take   
   material from would be the security services, presumably on the assumption   
   that if the cat ever flew out of the bag yowling it would be MI5 who would   
   take the consequences.   
      
   State sponsorship for these acts of psychological terrorism is also   
   indicated by duration; support for over six years for a team of three or   
   four people would be beyond the means and will of most private sources.   
   The viciousness of the slanders and personal denigration also points to   
   MI5; they traditionally "protect" the British state from politicians of the   
   wrong hue by character assassination, and in this case are using their   
   tried and tested methods to murder with words an enemy they have invented   
   for themselves.   
      
   And there are precedents. Diana and Hewitt were alleged to have been filmed   
   "at it" by an Army intelligence team which had operated in Northern   
   Ireland, these allegations were made by someone called Jones who had been   
   on the team. His statements were denied by the defence establishment who   
   tried to character-assassinate by describing him as the "Jones twins".   
   Funny how if you tell the truth, then you must be ill, isn't it? Thought   
   only communists behaved like that?   
      
   Hewitt later said that he'd been spoken to by someone in the army who   
   revealed the existence of videotapes of him and Diana, and that the tapes   
   would be published if any attempt was made by them to resume their   
   association.   
      
   686   
      
      
   --   
   Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)