Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.cyberspace    |    Part of that weird surfin-the-net thing    |    331 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 227 of 331    |
|    Patrick Meuser-Bianca to All    |
|    Ancient Egyptian Concepts Lost to False     |
|    05 Mar 08 16:21:28    |
      From: pmeuser-bianca@usag-ac.info              I remember as a child with my father who I originally knew as a person quite       different than who now stands married to a different woman, as much often as       my mother who is also remarried, the fact in life that true knowledge is       something that the spirit uplifts from the words of literal meaning for what       attachments in life society exists. The Ancient Egyptians knew all of this       for what in my life has become the ocuology and audioology of imprints in       the winds of time. For all of the paternal and maternal relationships in       this life-time, an existence marked for whatever then could be recorded, and       thus the 'cueniform' representation of what one is to mean in social       ambience so semi-synchronous with the means to actually carve a rock to such       precision, in order to convey a meaning as obvious the placid nature of       aggrarian culture as the Egyptians had built upon their rapid rise to       nutrition as a wealth yet untold, and design the pyramids. Not that any       thing was beyond their comprehsion now is as much a rapid evolution that       such figures could still exist, rather on the other hand for which there in       life of the early empire, there would be less within the capability of       organized groups to fall fare within the meaning of this 'cueniform'       meaning, or what it is to be observed as a record of meaningful sense.       These carved markings as the reminder and remainder of such energy that as       to my knowledge, is equally instilled in the eye of the beholder as the       characteriziation of the visitor, and the way techniques became technology       that was as well in the active time of such construction as abound leaps       beyond what was possible with yet only a record of techniques--henceforth       inscribed characters as to mean the hieroglyphs of causal analysis for which       future generations would divide (to say praise). What is surprising about       the way in which peiople assign meaning to places and times is the reality       for which an individual could be so alinged with another whose understanding       is the divination for what records are kept and were kept as the model for       what living to a certain metric delineated, as these markings so obvious,       something of unprincipled understanding as if the future was divided into       the past so inverse to an existence that stays divine. As today we have       these technologies based in networks for what the obvious tendency of people       is, to stay together, yet decieved by a concensus that either discounts a       certain segment or counts on the dead in a way that does not explain those       who live beyond the published life-expectancy or span to which such       publishin industry is as well based in the energies for what a successful       individual could comprehend. As the meaning for which words did not yet       exist, yet at the moment for what expectation could people have to depend on       the seasons as well by the organizations of word form to which expressions       determined rules by which the apocryphic nature of humanity we stood aside       from the reality for which this nature could be fit by change, for the       better terms that such as obvious as part of an empire and a story told. If       even we were simply independent able bodies of a existence that changed       before any system of thus understanding unto could either be accepted and       refused or just flat out refused to what it means to bring up something of a       system that held as its structure a reason to build.              But now its a shame, we've entered the age of controversion for what       effective meaning of defeatism we have accepted people at face value, so       superfluous even to think without relating in some form to what our senses       could only convey. Whether we've been decieved by a mistranslation of the       hieroglyphs or their story on papyrus was the unavoidable truth that from       the bull rushes did little baby Moses enter the empire, for who as pharoah       was a person to challenge all other's perception of the gods as something so       alien to the society already engaged by its off-spring, in long       distance--hunting for fire. How even the ability to harness this ability       from the tools that they claim were evident to start a fire, or rocks       (flint) that such could be ignited, its an obvious proportion to either or,       lightning bolts or the death of a creature for what feeding could may as       well be cooked; and if neccessary to stay warm. The falsities that even are       to capitalize a girl (Girl) for example we could not stay together as a       group to suffice the interaction of those events so challenging as for what       in tense means as well for the sense of survival, to never fall into the       traps that hunting each other would set. Either or, do the creatures that       we did hunt as the off-spring of those in humanity to have such perception       and then be able to tell a story means that the story always manifests the       truth beyond what words are said regardless of what initiative in drive       there is to convey the truth, especially if it were to deceive the senses as       such census remains (to no such agenda as the isomrphism of exchange could       be type-cast to a literal concensus). Among so few of those early homids       who were able to manifest tools, we could destine weapons for the same       purposes of destiny for which lightning bolts become so exceptional,       exceptions to the rule for what this type of status could never mean what       ancient Egypt was like. Even being propmpted by an incomplete story, as if       to manifest in the minds of an unknown number, or possibly even none, is the       travesty that our systems of information mean this balance (delicate) of       tools and weapons for what purposes of defence become an attributed sense of       such diction as either is fiction and comes true, or is non-fiction and       fiction. The aspects of this expansion are in fact only a lower fideltiy or       resolution to what could I remember, as the dog of the river that the       Ancient Gondala of Egyptian dead acrossed into the afterlife. Like the       pomegranite seeds of pluto, the lake of fire in the Bible, and the golden       Horseshoe for what efforts in action become an intelligible perception for       what odds we face to misinform and disinform any person to the history for       what means to the inhabitants of lands unchanging change as people to lands       abound, and therefore as much the same beyond the horizon, could they call       themselves in assistance that such assignments could not determine a       continual Turing test without first agreeing that suicide is impossible!       However the Turing solution is written as a testament to the existence of       man and woman, such a test would never find a mechnistic means of survival       beyond the requirements to stay warm among those even whose effectors and       affectors are as to should, to change with another person's sensors, as for              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca