XPost: alt.magick   
      
   "Robert Scott Martin"  wrote in message   
   news:gtno06$4kn$1@reader1.panix.com...   
   > In article <49ff52bb$0$4419$e4fe514c@dreader12.news.xs4all.nl>,   
   > bassos  wrote:   
   >   
   >>.......   
   >   
   > "Thats alot of dots."   
      
   I miss the reference, speed me up.   
      
   >>Yes, fucking multiple dots.   
   >   
   > X - XV. Concerning Sleep   
      
   Just go to the moon, and look up a bar.   
      
   See if you can find afterimages.   
      
   > The dream as compensation for perceived failure, which itself is a   
   > disturbance or "sore spot" of the will. The will disguising itself in   
   > order to produce the dream & thus communicate its disquiet to   
   > itself.   
      
   And thus being merely a facet of that same Will.   
      
   > (Compare to the section on chess.)   
      
   I am doing a session of not looking back, so dunno what continuation that   
   is.   
      
   > The ultimate union of the will despite incidental divisions of purpose.   
   > Choronzon. The magister templi   
   > oath as the key to the interpretation of dreams.   
      
   I still consider said Oath to merely be an acceptance of the way things are.   
      
   Not the Oaths fault if that accelerates some things.   
      
   > XVI. Ritual Praxis   
   >   
   > Daily routine as the antidote to drift.   
      
   16 makes me wonder if crowley knew about the futility of negatives.   
      
   >>I promise i will only post constructive posts in the liber aleph thread.   
   >   
   > Now where's the fun in that.   
      
   There is fun everywhere.   
      
   Besides, me talking pure construction leads to withdrawal far faster than   
   anything else.   
      
   So this is merely mocking that no discussion of liber aleph will take place.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)