XPost: alt.magick   
   From: glass@panix.com   
      
   >oblate spheroid   
      
   In article ,   
   Absorbed   wrote:   
   >On 28/09/10 00:48, Robert Scott Martin wrote:   
      
   >I still have no idea why you don't communicate clearly. Or maybe I'm   
   >just dumb. Is that it?   
      
   Who knows.   
      
   Ambiguities abound in any environment made of wrought language. Like   
   usenet or the site of much actual "magick."   
      
   "The affection in the dream does not belong to the latent content, to the   
   thoughts behind the dream; it stands in opposition to this content; it is   
   calculated to conceal the knowledge conveyed by the interpretation.   
   Probably this is precisely its function. I remember with what reluctance I   
   undertook the interpretation, how long I tried to postpone it, and how I   
   declared the dream to be sheer nonsense. I know from my psychoanalytic   
   practice how such a condemnation is to be interpreted. It has no   
   informative value, but merely expresses an affect. If my little daughter   
   does not like an apple which is offered her, she asserts that the apple is   
   bitter, without even tasting it. If my patients behave thus, I know that   
   we are dealing with an idea which they are trying to repress. The same   
   thing applies to my dream. I do not want to interpret it because there is   
   something in the interpretation to which I object. After the   
   interpretation of the dream is completed, I discover what it was to which   
   I objected."   
      
   Or with less schillering about: Das Beste, was [du] wissen kannst, darfst   
   [du] den Buben doch nicht sagen.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)