Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.disney.criticism    |    Debating how much Disney sucks    |    160 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 151 of 160    |
|    useapen to All    |
|    How Big Did 'Snow White' Really Bomb? TH    |
|    22 Apr 25 08:15:18    |
      XPost: alt.politics.trump, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sac.politics       XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.business       From: yourdime@outlook.com              It seemed almost impossible, even to "Snow White" remake critics like       myself, that it might fail to crack $200 million at the box office. Yet if       the movie does cross that threshold, it will be by the skin of Quigg's       teeth.              Quigg is apparently a character in the new live-action version. I only       know this because I checked IMDB for characters who weren't in the       original, making me one of maybe 12 people who weren't involved in the       production who know there's a Quigg.              In its fifth weekend on screens, "Snow White" earned about $7 million in       ticket sales domestically and internationally, bringing the total box       office take to an estimated $194 million. The film cost an estimated $270       million (after tax credits!) plus another $70-$100 million to market and       probably needs $625 million, after theaters take their cut, just to break       even.              Oof.              While "Snow White" floundered, Disney announced that the live-action       remake of "Tangled" was "on hold." While not officially canceled, the       studio has given zero indication when or even if development will resume.              In box office terms, live-action remakes aren't any different from any       other genre. Some do well, some break even, some (like "Snow White") flop.       Creatively, though, each one reveals Hollywood's creative bankruptcy, just       as much as the endless parade of superhero movies (and their diminishing       returns, financially and creatively) does.              Worse, live-action remakes are unnecessary. Animation has a timeless,       netherworld charm to it that photorealistic CGI animals and dwarves simply       can't.              For all the online chatter, "Snow White" could have done much better, and       just a handful of different decisions made early in the movie's production       would have made all the difference.              First, a flick like "Snow White" has no business costing $320 million to       produce, even if a $50 million UK tax credit brought Disney's cost down to       $270 million. But a movie musical shouldn't be a third-of-a-billion-       dollars extravaganza, particularly not one aimed at the Disney princess       set. The live-action Snow White reboot should have been a $125 million       movie.              All Disney had to do was hire some real dwarves instead of those demented       CGI escapees from the Uncanny Valley. They could have used practical sets       instead of a green-screen-heavy production that star Rachel Zegler, in       particular, seemed ill at ease with. Maybe they could have insisted on a       script that didn't go all-in on Woke (reportedly before the rewrites) and       socialism for the reshoots.              Finally, Disney could have avoided the bad press by getting back to doing       what movie studios used to do for every release: keep the actors tightly       scripted during all appearances (now including online) until the picture       is on the silver screens. Reportedly, Snow White's budget-busting reshoots       were needed to plug holes blasted out of the script by Zegler's off-script       remarks.              The film might still have sucked, but at least it would have cost a       reasonable amount to produce and not had so much bad buzz going for more       than a year before its release.              Shoot a kiddie flick that doesn't suck for $125 million, promote it for       another $50 million, then count the profits as "Snow White" soars to a       $400 or even $500 million box office.              Or — please hear me out — take the original, spend a few million cleaning       up the print and punching up the score for multichannel sound, and       rerelease it to audiences hungry for quality family entertainment.              Maybe that sounds crazy, but is it any less crazy than spending close to       $400 million on a $200 million flop?              https://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2025/04/21/how-big-did-snow-white-really-       bomb-this-big-n4939095              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca