Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    linux.debian.devel.testing    |    Debian developer testing    |    27 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3 of 27    |
|    Ed Heil to All    |
|    Bug#1111043: upgrade-reports: Diverted /    |
|    14 Aug 25 00:20:01    |
      XPost: linux.debian.bugs.dist       From: last.rain1438@fastmail.com              Package: upgrade-reports       Severity: normal       X-Debbugs-Cc: last.rain1438@fastmail.com              (Please provide enough information to help the Debian       maintainers evaluate the report efficiently - e.g., by filling       in the sections below.)              My previous release is: bookworm       I am upgrading to: trixie       Archive date: ?       Upgrade date: 2025-08-13       uname -a before upgrade: (unavailable)       uname -a after upgrade: Linux zothique 6.12.38+deb13-amd64 #1 SMP       PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.12.38-1 (2025-07-16) x86_64 GNU/Linux (this is after       problem was remediated manually       Method: followed instructions at       https://www.debian.org/releases/trixie/release-notes/upgrading.en.html              Contents of /etc/apt/sources.list:              I removed /etc/apt/sources.list completely and replaced it with debian.sources       per instructions                     - Were there any non-Debian packages installed before the upgrade? If        so, what were they?              no              - Was the system pre-update a 'pure' system only containing packages        from the previous release? If not, which packages were not from that        release?              yes              - Did any packages fail to upgrade?              no              - Were there any problems with the system after upgrading?              yes              The problem was simple: when I ran a tool such as "neofetch" it said I was       still on "bookworm." Looking around /etc/ I discovered that /etc/os-release       was a regular file (not a symlink) which contained the following:              PRETTY_NAME="Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)"       NAME="Debian GNU/Linux"       VERSION_ID="12"       VERSION="12 (bookworm)"       VERSION_CODENAME=bookworm       ID=debian       HOME_URL="https://www.debian.org/"       SUPPORT_URL="https://www.debian.org/support"       BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.debian.org/"       IMAGE_ID=live       BUILD_ID=20241109T101058Z              I learned from commenters on reddit that this was one of the "base-files"       package. Messing with dpkg -l I discovered that this had been "diverted" so       that the symlink which was supposed to be there was at /etc/os-       release.debootstrap . I removed the file /etc/os-release manually and ran       "sudo dpkg-divert --remove --rename /etc/os-release" to un-divert the file, and       that fixed it.              I don't know why that diversion happened; it was probably that way ever since I       first installed the system. However, it would have been helpful if in the       process of upgrading to trixie, that diversion were removed so that /etc/os-       release could accurately reflect the system. The fact that that didn't happen       and I was left with an inaccurate /etc/os-release is the substance of the bug       report.                     Further Comments/Problems:                     Please attach the output of "COLUMNS=200 dpkg -l" (or "env COLUMNS ...",       depending on your shell) from before and after the upgrade so that we       know what packages were installed on your system.              I didn't do this before the upgrade, and I'm skipping it now since I'm pretty       sure that would be irrelevant to the bug report but I can provide this info for       my current system on request.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca